Close

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 50 of 50
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by jason Click here to enlarge
    He is a shop owner in Northern Ca. Its tough to pin down what he is currently running because he is either constantly changing or breaking things. It is as mentioned before run off a TECIIIR tuned by Vic Sias and is pretty much a dedicated drag car.
    How do you know all of this?

    What shop is it?

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    111
    Rep Points
    87.3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    How do you know all of this?

    What shop is it?
    From reading on bimmerforums. If you search his user name there are bits a pieces through out his posts but its pretty scattered. Some of them don't make much sense though.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by jason Click here to enlarge
    From reading on bimmerforums. If you search his user name there are bits a pieces through out his posts but its pretty scattered. Some of them don't make much sense though.
    You would think there would be more details and he would be playing it up more.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    111
    Rep Points
    87.3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    From the looks of it he seems pretty humble. He makes great power and backs it up with some really nice quarter mile times. Just posts sporadically with not alot of hype....or info for that matter.

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    977
    Rep Points
    779.1
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Reputation: Yes | No
    ^^^ thats how it should be!


    as far as dynojet inaccuracies, is the '85 VMax mathematics still a factor?
    Last edited by dreikraft; 01-18-2011 at 10:32 PM.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by dreikraft Click here to enlarge
    as far as dynojet inaccuracies, is the '85 VMax mathematics still a factor?
    Explain this please.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    977
    Rep Points
    779.1
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Dynojet's final number-fudge was arbitrarily based on a number from the most powerful road-going motorcycle of the time, the '85 1,200cc Yamaha VMax. The VMax had 145 advertised factory horsepower, which was far above the raw 90hp number spit out by the formula. Meanwhile, existing aftermarket torque-cell engine dynamometers delivered numbers that clustered around 120. Always a pragmatist, Dobeck finally ordered his Chief Engineer to doctor the math so that the Dynojet 100 measured 120 hp for a stock VMax. And that was that: For once and forever, the power of everything else in the world would be relative to the '85 Yamaha VMax and a fudged imaginary number. Dobeck's engineering staff was dismayed by the decision, but the Dynojet 100 exclusively measured surplus power available to accelerate the vehicle's mass-no more, no less-and that was true even if the modification was a low-inertia flywheel or lightweight wheels. As long as the inertial dyno's numbers were repeatable, the critical question (did a particular modification make the engine accelerate faster or slower?) would be answered correctly.
    from hotrod.com

    don't know if this is still a factor. it happened a long time ago but the way this was written it looks like that arbitrary 'fudge' is set in stone.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    The car spoken about will rape it soon. F dyno sheets.
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  9. #34
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    FU
    Posts
    1,056
    Rep Points
    -420.8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Yup,
    David likes to go fast and he obviously knows that the E36 can go faster
    or he wouldn't be progressing with this build.

    Exciting Santa Clara stuff there.
    Click here to enlarge
    www
    milkt org

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Sure is
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    977
    Rep Points
    779.1
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GG///M3 Click here to enlarge
    The car spoken about will rape it soon. F dyno sheets.
    lol, whats up with your sig?

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    306
    Rep Points
    268.1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    2 out of 2 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    FYI, THis car just made 953hp 821 torque with Bav Sol cams.

    This was conservative tuning at 39psi (peak, actually holding less boost from having some WG or BC problem). Also, he made 54 more whp at less boost (w/ the boost issue) and 6 * LESS TIMING!!!!

    Goes to show that Bav Sol knows what they are doing with their hardware more than some Attorney wants to give credit. I think someone's going to be in hot libel water.
    | 1997 Estoril M3 - TURBO - |
    Click here to enlarge
    | GT3582R | 8.5:1 forged internals | ARP stuffs | SS oring block & Elring HG | Fully balanced & blueprinted 3.3L S52 |
    | Nick G custom tune | 46mm Precision gate | 62# injectors | Dual 255's |

    Goal to be the first GT35r E36 to: 30 psi, 140+ mph, < 6 second 60-130

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rt turbo Click here to enlarge
    FYI, THis car just made 953hp 821 torque with Bav Sol cams.

    This was conservative tuning at 39psi (peak, actually holding less boost from having some WG or BC problem). Also, he made 54 more whp at less boost (w/ the boost issue) and 6 * LESS TIMING!!!!

    Goes to show that Bav Sol knows what they are doing with their hardware more than some Attorney wants to give credit. I think someone's going to be in hot libel water.


    thats some real power..


    link to bold?

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    306
    Rep Points
    268.1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    thats some real power..


    link to bold?
    its in the E39 m5 Engine section.
    | 1997 Estoril M3 - TURBO - |
    Click here to enlarge
    | GT3582R | 8.5:1 forged internals | ARP stuffs | SS oring block & Elring HG | Fully balanced & blueprinted 3.3L S52 |
    | Nick G custom tune | 46mm Precision gate | 62# injectors | Dual 255's |

    Goal to be the first GT35r E36 to: 30 psi, 140+ mph, < 6 second 60-130

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Yes its impressive
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rt turbo Click here to enlarge
    FYI, THis car just made 953hp 821 torque with Bav Sol cams.

    This was conservative tuning at 39psi (peak, actually holding less boost from having some WG or BC problem). Also, he made 54 more whp at less boost (w/ the boost issue) and 6 * LESS TIMING!!!!

    Goes to show that Bav Sol knows what they are doing with their hardware more than some Attorney wants to give credit. I think someone's going to be in hot libel water.
    Please tell me you have this graph?

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    thats some real power..


    link to bold?
    He is referring to this: http://www.bimmerboost.com/content.p...ld-blown-motor

  18. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rt turbo Click here to enlarge
    FYI, THis car just made 953hp 821 torque with Bav Sol cams.

    This was conservative tuning at 39psi (peak, actually holding less boost from having some WG or BC problem). Also, he made 54 more whp at less boost (w/ the boost issue) and 6 * LESS TIMING!!!!

    Goes to show that Bav Sol knows what they are doing with their hardware more than some Attorney wants to give credit. I think someone's going to be in hot libel water.
    I have been trying to find details on this to put it up on the front page but I'm coming up empty.

  19. #44
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    PEI, Canada
    Posts
    1,123
    Rep Points
    1,665.0
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    I have been trying to find details on this to put it up on the front page but I'm coming up empty.
    I know you love links to other forums....sorry:

    http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1610273

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    le Paris
    Posts
    6,653
    Rep Points
    -226.0
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PEI330Ci Click here to enlarge
    I know you love links to other forums....sorry:

    http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1610273
    save some for his birthday

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PEI330Ci Click here to enlarge
    I know you love links to other forums....sorry:

    http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1610273
    It's ok, sometimes it's necessary and bimmerforums doesn't totally censor us so no big deal, thanks for pointing me in the right direction.

  22. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,826
    Rep Points
    31,567.3
    Mentioned
    2065 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rt turbo Click here to enlarge
    FYI, THis car just made 953hp 821 torque with Bav Sol cams.

    This was conservative tuning at 39psi (peak, actually holding less boost from having some WG or BC problem). Also, he made 54 more whp at less boost (w/ the boost issue) and 6 * LESS TIMING!!!!

    Goes to show that Bav Sol knows what they are doing with their hardware more than some Attorney wants to give credit. I think someone's going to be in hot libel water.
    Check here, posted the update: http://www.bimmerboost.com/showthrea...445#post115445

    This is an S52 right?

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    306
    Rep Points
    268.1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Check here, posted the update: http://www.bimmerboost.com/showthrea...445#post115445

    This is an S52 right?
    Yes, s52, 87mm with oring and stock elring HG. Funny how when people who know how to make a head seal coming into play people are going back to the 87mm block that was supposed to be a no-no for boost.
    | 1997 Estoril M3 - TURBO - |
    Click here to enlarge
    | GT3582R | 8.5:1 forged internals | ARP stuffs | SS oring block & Elring HG | Fully balanced & blueprinted 3.3L S52 |
    | Nick G custom tune | 46mm Precision gate | 62# injectors | Dual 255's |

    Goal to be the first GT35r E36 to: 30 psi, 140+ mph, < 6 second 60-130

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rt turbo Click here to enlarge
    Yes, s52, 87mm with oring and stock elring HG. Funny how when people who know how to make a head seal coming into play people are going back to the 87mm block that was supposed to be a no-no for boost.
    Dvcee the Wizard of PA has known of these secret's for year's. I have been thinking about removing my mls to swap in an erling with an o-ringed block, but I'm not looking to push much boost yet.
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    86
    Rep Points
    75.6
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Good God, those are some amazing numbers!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •