Close

Page 1 of 51 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 1251
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Some kills i have done with my 09 CLK550 in the past

    So i have my car a little over a year and was able to put a smack down on a few cars, clk550 is a very under rated car because MB didn't want people $#@!ing out from buying clk63 amg.

    This is my last run vs 505 AWD evo 40mph Roll the video guy forgot to record the run but recorded inside the car.



    This is a Run against 355 WHP 370Z nismo very quick little car me and him met in the past stock vs stock you will see that video more down the line. He called me out after he got all his parts on the car to see if he can whoop my ass. here is the outcome
    This video is when we ware both stock i had a passenger that was 260lb plus me 200lbs
    he was alone

    Here is the video of a rematch nearly a year later with all bolt ons and a tune.

    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlargeClick here to enlargeClick here to enlargeClick here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

    This is a run vs a fellow clk550 owner his car does not have a tune but everything else is exactly the same yes i paid $300 for my tune. Click here to enlarge



    Here is some Burn out videos with all the TQ i cant resist it =D





    Stock Clk550 vs Moded Evo 9
    My boy with his Evo nice was bashing my car saying he will walk all over me so i had to take him on it.



    This was my 1st run with my Friends Legacy GT stage 2 also was bashing how he will whoop my ass Click here to enlarge


    woot woot.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    152
    Rep Points
    160.0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    So i have my car a little over a year and was able to put a smack down on a few cars, clk550 is a very under rated car because MB didn't want people $#@!ing out from buying clk63 amg.
    You have a nice car but I do not agree with your comment. You're talking about easily 100 hp difference. Put it this way...the CLK63 (cabrio) does low 12 and the CLK550 does low 13

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Nice. Find a e92 M3 to race with. You claim to have 410hp so a stock e92 M3 should be a nice race.
    Click here to enlarge

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Karo Click here to enlarge
    You have a nice car but I do not agree with your comment. You're talking about easily 100 hp difference. Put it this way...the CLK63 (cabrio) does low 12 and the CLK550 does low 13
    clk550 does high 12's once again shows that the car is under rated.



    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    Nice. Find a e92 M3 to race with. You claim to have 410hp so a stock e92 M3 should be a nice race.
    ive ran stock vs stock and beat them now i need to record a video =D

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    152
    Rep Points
    160.0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    clk550 does high 12's once again shows that the car is under rated.
    Where? Sounds like it's just a claim. Never seen or heard of one doing 12.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    1,177
    Rep Points
    933.6
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I SAW A CLK550 beat a e39m5 the other day and i was shocked!!! very nice cars

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Yeah that was my boy completely stock clk550 M5 was moded.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    ive ran stock vs stock and beat them now i need to record a video =D
    No offense to you, but that is not possible.

    The E92 M3 is a much faster car than the CLK550 and is basically neck and neck with the C63 AMG which is much faster than the CLK550.

    Sorry, but whomever you raced did not know they were racing. Now I think I remember you, you are the guy who was claiming to have beaten an E92 M3 right and everyone said "wtf" across multiple forums?

    Bud, your CLK is a nice car, but an E92 M3 is much faster stock for stock and even more so modded.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Karo Click here to enlarge
    Where? Sounds like it's just a claim. Never seen or heard of one doing 12.
    Neither have I. The car runs low 13's @ 107-108.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    His is modded. Supposedly 410hp
    Click here to enlarge

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    clk550 is a very under rated car because MB didn't want people $#@!ing out from buying clk63 amg.
    Sorry, but this is not true.

    The 63 motor also has more displacement, better heads, higher redline, and simply is a better motor. They aren't even remotely close, the M156 is far stronger.

    The 550 is not underrated and never has been and certainly does not stop on the 63's toes.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    His is modded. Supposedly 410hp
    Yes, but he claimed to pull stock. Even if he was modded to 410 he wouldn't pull an M3.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Boca Raton FL
    Posts
    2,042
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Yes, but he claimed to pull stock. Even if he was modded to 410 he wouldn't pull an M3.
    Couldn't he be even with a stock manual.
    Click here to enlarge

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Yes, but he claimed to pull stock. Even if he was modded to 410 he wouldn't pull an M3.
    you guys always forget to count in the TQ Benzes have vs BMW but it's ok once i have it on video you guy will have your jaws droped to the floor.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Points
    460.0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Ill race you for 5K cash in a stock e92 or a bolt on evo 9 let me know when you're ready!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    This is a run between the same nismo i ran when it only had test pipes and no cai exaust and a tune vs Tune *map 7*/Intake 6mt E92 335i
    if you look at comments the 335i driver claims 112 trap speed... my 550 walks away every time from that Nismo by 2+ cars so if nismo was able to pull on the 335i that traps 112 and i pull 2 plus cars on the nismo what is the outcome? also as i always say don't compare 1/4 runs to Roll Runs completely diff factors here.


  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 600whp S4 Click here to enlarge
    Ill race you for 5K cash in a stock e92 or a bolt on evo 9 let me know when you're ready!
    If you watched the video i already ran bolt on Evo 9 with gutted out interior and trunk also took out his conditioner when i was stock,
    safe your self the 5k please.
    But if you wanna run the E92 be my guest i will certainly love to run it.
    Last edited by blkclk550; 12-18-2010 at 06:18 PM.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by FR305 Click here to enlarge
    Couldn't he be even with a stock manual.
    No, not possible. Less whp, heavier car, worse gearing. It just isn't possible.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    you guys always forget to count in the TQ Benzes have vs BMW but it's ok once i have it on video you guy will have your jaws droped to the floor.
    You said this a long time ago as well... no video.

    The torque multiplication by the gearing is larger in the M3. It really doesn't matter, the curve is shorter in the CLK550 and it runs slower traps, dyno's less, and weighs far more through a slower shifting auto. I don't know why you miss this.

    You really believe you are as fast an E92 M3? Run at the track or post some Vbox numbers. Don't be surprised when the result doesn't match your expectations...

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    This is a run between the same nismo i ran when it only had test pipes and no cai exaust and a tune vs Tune *map 7*/Intake 6mt E92 335i if you look at comments the 335i driver claims 112 trap speed... my 550 walks away every time from that Nismo by 2+ cars so if nismo was able to pull on the 335i that traps 112 and i pull 2 plus cars on the nismo what is the outcome? also as i always say don't compare 1/4 runs to Roll Runs completely diff factors here.
    I'm sorry, what different factors? The trap speed determines what is faster from a roll, not completely different factors at all. Elapsed time is a different factor, yes.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Not gonn argue anymore i will post my 1/4 slip and videos vs M3 as you can see from my videos i ran quite a few moded cars. If i walked a 370 that was passing 112 trap 335i that tells you once again clk550 is UNDER RATED.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    878
    Rep Points
    891.7
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    RICER MATH and ego for ones own car at it's best.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    This is a run between the same nismo i ran when it only had test pipes and no cai exaust and a tune vs Tune *map 7*/Intake 6mt E92 335i
    if you look at comments the 335i driver claims 112 trap speed... my 550 walks away every time from that Nismo by 2+ cars so if nismo was able to pull on the 335i that traps 112 and i pull 2 plus cars on the nismo what is the outcome?
    I do not see a video of you pulling the 335? No offense, but a tuned 335 with just tune alone will walk you.

    You really, seriously, overestimate the CLK550. I know you are proud of your car, and that is good, but please be realistic. It is a great ride with some nice performance as well.

    Please run at the strip or run some 60-130 times. Your car is likely in the 12 second range 60-130 and probably traps 109 at best.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,157
    Rep Points
    -9.0
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    dude that 335i ran the same exact 370 i ran we all know each other..............
    this is my car fully stock 25-115 @ a very humid day and not in Dyno Mode.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,725
    Rep Points
    31,540.5
    Mentioned
    2064 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by blkclk550 Click here to enlarge
    Not gonn argue anymore i will post my 1/4 slip and videos vs M3 as you can see from my videos i ran quite a few moded cars. If i walked a 370 that was passing 112 trap 335i that tells you once again clk550 is UNDER RATED.
    I don't understand, how is it underated?

    It is pretty simple, is your car as fast as a C63 AMG? No.

Page 1 of 51 12311 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •