Close

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 76

Thread: M2 render!!!

  1. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    47
    Rep Points
    38.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    I cant see how they would eek out 350HP from a 4cyl turbo, when their inline-6 twin turbo in the 1M gets 340HP. Yes it could be done but it would be un-BMW-like to give that much power to a production 4 cylinder. I could see them getting it to 3100 pounds though, that is a reasonable target weight. Either way I'm sure this will be one of the more fun M cars to drive if they get around to making it.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Portillo's
    Posts
    1,503
    Rep Points
    238.2
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    Yes Reputation No
    I like that a lot.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Jersey City
    Posts
    3,852
    Rep Points
    3,642.6
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37


    Yes Reputation No
    I love it, maybe I'll get this in a couple years when I'm sick of my m3
    Click here to enlarge
    ESS 6XX kit

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Valley Stream NY
    Posts
    3,347
    Rep Points
    2,757.4
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    28


    Yes Reputation No
    i like it. sign me up!

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    What would happen to the 235i? Would it still have an n55?
    Of course.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DubSport Click here to enlarge
    Yes it could be done but it would be un-BMW-like to give that much power to a production 4 cylinder.
    Why? The S14 put out more power than many BMW 6's so it actually would be very BMW to give that much power to a production 4-cylinder.

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    HG Motorsports
    Posts
    389
    Rep Points
    512.8
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DubSport Click here to enlarge
    I cant see how they would eek out 350HP from a 4cyl turbo, when their inline-6 twin turbo in the 1M gets 340HP. Yes it could be done but it would be un-BMW-like to give that much power to a production 4 cylinder. I could see them getting it to 3100 pounds though, that is a reasonable target weight. Either way I'm sure this will be one of the more fun M cars to drive if they get around to making it.
    Mercedes' new 2.0 turbo (going into the 45 AMG cars) is already known to make 354 horsepower, so BMW will need to be in that ballpark to be competitive. Should be interesting to say the least, I'm hoping the M2 will be my next car.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    Mercedes' new 2.0 turbo (going into the 45 AMG cars) is already known to make 354 horsepower,
    And exceeds many of their 6-cylinders...

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,865
    Rep Points
    2,450.1
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    25


    Yes Reputation No
    Doesn't make much sense to have a much cheaper version, the 235i have a turbo I6 and the M car have an I4 does it? How many people would justify the extra$$$ for a smaller engine? Even though output would be somewhat higher, potential HP output would still go to the I6.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Of course.
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


  10. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    HG Motorsports
    Posts
    389
    Rep Points
    512.8
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    Doesn't make much sense to have a much cheaper version, the 235i have a turbo I6 and the M car have an I4 does it? How many people would justify the extra$$$ for a smaller engine? Even though output would be somewhat higher, potential HP output would still go to the I6.
    I don't understand why people always go to theoretical arguments here, the E30 M3 already exists. It sold incredibly well, crushing its competition from Mercedes, and no one really cared that it had less cylinders, in fact it was partly because of that short inline four that the E30 M3 was so nimble and so willing to change direction and that's exactly why I'm looking forward to the M2. I think it's funny that BMW made the X5 and X6 Ms and people cried that BMW was selling out by making cars that a lot of customers apparently wanted (they're selling really well, my local dealer still can't keep either of them on the lot because they sell every one they get immediately) and then when BMW finally makes a car just for the enthusiast, people complain about that. My only concern is the engine / exhaust noise, I love straight sixes and am not the biggest inline four fan but I'll wait and see how it turns out.

    As for potential horsepower, literally zero percent of the car-buying public actually modifies their cars and those that do typically stick to simple bolt-ons. Only a very few people care about making seriously big power out of any given platform and the manufacturer rarely worries about those people.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,865
    Rep Points
    2,450.1
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    25


    Yes Reputation No
    So in other words you're saying that plethora of 400-500WHP 335i running around had nothing to do with the new M3/M4 having a turbo I6? Why wouldn't BMW stay with mercedes and just keep the N/A V8 for the next gen M3? It's because BMW saw so many high HP 335i and prob saw new M3 sales drop due to customers not being able to justify the $20-30k price difference between a new 335i and a new M3. I just don't see how you will be able to sell an M2 with an I4 when a customer can spend $10k less and buy a 235i with an I6? M car buyers are enthusiasts not your average car buyer.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    I don't understand why people always go to theoretical arguments here, the E30 M3 already exists. It sold incredibly well, crushing its competition from Mercedes, and no one really cared that it had less cylinders, in fact it was partly because of that short inline four that the E30 M3 was so nimble and so willing to change direction and that's exactly why I'm looking forward to the M2. My only concern is the engine / exhaust noise, I love straight sixes and am not the biggest inline four fan but I'll wait and see how it turns out.

    As for potential horsepower, literally zero percent of the car-buying public actually modifies their cars and those that do typically stick to simple bolt-ons. Only a very few people care about making seriously big power out of any given platform and the manufacturer rarely worries about those people.
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    Doesn't make much sense to have a much cheaper version, the 235i have a turbo I6 and the M car have an I4 does it? How many people would justify the extra$$$ for a smaller engine? Even though output would be somewhat higher, potential HP output would still go to the I6.
    Because it's an M motor designed with performance in mind as well as the chassis, brakes, and suspension. You haven't even seen the motor yet.

    How many people opted for the E30 M3 over the 325? Why did they even though the six cylinder was bigger?

    Extra $ for a smaller engine isn't bad. I'd rather have the Audi 2.5 TFSI5-cylinder than their 3.2 liter V6.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    It sold incredibly well, crushing its competition from Mercedes, and no one really cared that it had less cylinders, in fact it was partly because of that short inline four that the E30 M3 was so nimble and so willing to change direction and that's exactly why I'm looking forward to the M2
    Exactly, this was already done. People are forgetting their history.

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    So in other words you're saying that plethora of 400-500WHP 335i running around had nothing to do with the new M3/M4 having a turbo I6? Why wouldn't BMW stay with mercedes and just keep the N/A V8 for the next gen M3? It's because BMW saw so many high HP 335i and prob saw new M3 sales drop due to customers not being able to justify the $20-30k price difference between a new 335i and a new M3. I just don't see how you will be able to sell an M2 with an I4 when a customer can spend $10k less and buy a 235i with an I6? M car buyers are enthusiasts not your average car buyer.
    The reason the M3 will have an inline-6 is because the M5/M6 have twin turbo V8's. It is also because the M division changed to forced induction.

    The 335 came out before the E92 M3 yet the M3 still had a naturally aspirated V8. Why? The M5/M6 had a V10 that the M3 V8 was based off.

    The M3 gets the I6 to fit nicely albeit artifically into the range. It has nothing to do with aftermarket tuning of 335's. M3 owners don't give a $#@! about the 335. Also, everyone doesn't tune. It's a minority.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,865
    Rep Points
    2,450.1
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    25


    Yes Reputation No
    That isn't really a fair comparison. The N55 is a much better motor than what you guys are comparing it to. If I had to chose a 350HP I4 M car or a 235i with an N55, the 235i being $10-15k cheaper. I'm thinking 235i now, but that may change once we see the engine and the car. I would have loved a 1M if it didn't cost so much damn money.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Exactly, this was already done. People are forgetting their history.
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


  16. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    That isn't really a fair comparison. The N55 is a much better motor than what you guys are comparing it to. If I had to chose a 350HP I4 M car or a 235i with an N55, the 235i being $10-15k cheaper. I'm thinking 235i now, but that may change once we see the engine and the car. I would have loved a 1M if it didn't cost so much damn money.
    It's the exact same thing, how isn't it fair? 6 cylinder versus 4 cylinder.

    Would you rather have a six cylinder in your evo or a sportier 4?

    Get a 235i with the N55 then. I know I would rather have the M2 before even seeing it or its specs. I'd rather have the Audi S4 with the smaller 3.0 TFSI than with the 4.2 liter V8 it used to have as well.

  17. #42
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,865
    Rep Points
    2,450.1
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    25


    Yes Reputation No
    I'm not in the market for either car, just saying. Not sure how sales will be for an M2 with a I4.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    It's the exact same thing, how isn't it fair? 6 cylinder versus 4 cylinder.

    Would you rather have a six cylinder in your evo or a sportier 4?

    Get a 235i with the N55 then. I know I would rather have the M2 before even seeing it or its specs. I'd rather have the Audi S4 with the smaller 3.0 TFSI than with the 4.2 liter V8 it used to have as well.
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


  18. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    I'm not in the market for either car, just saying. Not sure how sales will be for an M2 with a I4.
    How were sales for the E30 M3? Or the E9X M3 despite the fact you could tune a 335?

  19. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    HG Motorsports
    Posts
    389
    Rep Points
    512.8
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by bigdnno98 Click here to enlarge
    M car buyers are enthusiasts not your average car buyer.
    I beg to differ, the VAST majority (at least 75%) of M buyers are just posers or the type of rich person who goes in and just says "gimme the most expensive 3 series" or whatever. Maybe this is different in other parts of the world, but I'm very close with a lot of salesmen at a few different BMW dealerships around San Diego and that's basically the truth around here. Almost every single M3 I see driving around is driven by a soccer mom or an old guy.

    I was at the dealer last week and a guy was there with his new M6, he said he had a few thousand miles on it already so I asked if he had tried full throttle acceleration yet and he came back with "Why would I do that?" .....uhh, why would you buy a 560 horsepower car if you're not planning to use it? They do sell that same car with a six cylinder engine for a reason.

    Another example, a friend of my dad has a CLK55 AMG and all he ever does is complain about how quickly the tires wear out and how much gas it drinks. He said the fastest he's ever been in it is 85 and he doesn't get why it has to be so uncomfortable.....oh, and I just remembered a couple that lives near me has a C63 as their only car. They are both in their 80s.

    The way I see it, most of these posers / badge whores will now buy the M235i and this will free up the M2 from having to cater to them. We all win in the end.

  20. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    I beg to differ, the VAST majority (at least 75%) of M buyers are just posers or the type of rich person who goes in and just says "gimme the most expensive 3 series" or whatever. Maybe this is different in other parts of the world, but I'm very close with a lot of salesmen at a few different BMW dealerships around San Diego and that's basically the truth around here. Almost every single M3 I see driving around is driven by a soccer mom or an old guy.
    This is true. Salespeople (well who don't know me) at the dealership always assume I'm not in the market for an M3 based on age. It's mostly older people.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    Another example, a friend of my dad has a CLK55 AMG and all he ever does is complain about how quickly the tires wear out and how much gas it drinks.
    My father is similar.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    The way I see it, most of these posers / badge whores will now buy the M235i and this will free up the M2 from having to cater to them. We all win in the end.
    I think the M2 will be much more exciting with the higher strung M built 4-cylinder giving that racy feel rather than the lazier N55. The internals and heads will likely be better too. I think it's a great idea.

  21. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Jersey City
    Posts
    3,852
    Rep Points
    3,642.6
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    37


    Yes Reputation No
    It takes a while to develop a car and engine, the fact that people modded 335's has nothing to do with the new m getting a 6cylinder, that decision was made a while ago...

    The m2 will be a huge seller if the car has great performance....

    Also, I have a fbo 335, and although it's quicker than a stock m3, the m3 is such a more well rounded performance car.
    Click here to enlarge
    ESS 6XX kit

  22. #47
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    509
    Rep Points
    313.1
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Remonster Click here to enlarge
    Mercedes' new 2.0 turbo (going into the 45 AMG cars) is already known to make 354 horsepower, so BMW will need to be in that ballpark to be competitive. Should be interesting to say the least, I'm hoping the M2 will be my next car.
    Link please?

  23. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,917
    Rep Points
    31,886.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by maxnix Click here to enlarge
    Link please?
    Do people not read the sites?

    http://www.benzboost.com/content.php...-call-the-M133

  24. #49
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    994
    Rep Points
    938.4
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10



    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Check out this interesting info about the M2 from Car and Driver.

    http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-detailed-news
    ​#Chuckstrong

  25. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Clarksville, TN
    Posts
    3,865
    Rep Points
    2,450.1
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    25


    Yes Reputation No
    That article says I6
    2011 335is DCT, JB4 + MHD BEF, stage 2 LPFP, e50 + 50/50 meth, FBO, MT ET Streets when needed


Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •