-
01-29-2013, 12:54 AM #1026
Damn, I would be $#@!ing pissed if I were in your shoes. Seems like you have to keep buying $#@! on top of the kit to get anywhere near Shiv's advertised times.
Disappointing times aside, does it atleast feel faster on highway pulls when you're in the powerband? I think your gearing and turbo is more suited to 60-130s. Have you had a chance to do 60-130s?
I hope you get all this sorted out :/2007 e92 Mont. Blue 335i | 6MT | COBB Tuned | Quaife 3.46 LSD | Helix FMIC | AA DPs | HKS Exhaust | Dinan CAI | Stett CP w/ Forged DVs | KWv2 Coilovers | UUC Sway Bars & SSK | HPF Stg 2 Clutch | HFS-4 | M3 Suspension Bits | DEFIVfab Diff Lockdown Kit
-
01-29-2013, 12:54 AM #ADS
-
01-29-2013, 01:25 AM #1027
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 1,554
- Rep Points
- 1,151.3
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 12
You got your shifting dialed in well for your stock turbo setup. Getting it working for ST as well will result a lot quicker times.
-
01-29-2013, 02:16 AM #1028
Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Posts
- 5
- Rep Points
- 0.5
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 0
-
01-29-2013, 02:17 AM #1029
Hmmm...This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 03:27 AM #1030
Sorry your still having issues but thanks for sharing your results! Is there any reason you haven't been posting your times at the track over on e90? Does shiv not want potential customers to know that they shouldn't expect to match his 10 second time?
-
01-29-2013, 10:48 AM #1031
lets see some slips please, include date and time on the slip
...If people appreciate a very high level of engineering, a power delivery with excellent response, lots of low-mid rpm torque combined with a powerful non stop top end , appreciate the air to air setup... then this is kit will interest them...
-
01-29-2013, 10:51 AM #1032
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
The car 100% feels faster than with the stock turbos....except under 4000rpm.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
There is no question that it is faster, just not what I think it should be. My best trap on stock turbos 93+meth was around 117.xx, race+meth 118.9, e85/93+meth 118.
as far as 60-130, at 60 mph I'm right under 3800rpm. I need to be higher than that.
-
01-29-2013, 10:51 AM #1033
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
No just haven't because I'm lazy/busy with other stuff.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 11:00 AM #1034
Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Posts
- 146
- Rep Points
- 240.7
- Mentioned
- 2 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Thanks for the update Gtech. I am glad one of the Vishnu ST's is actually running their setup and sharing results. I still want to see how the auto ST's are doing.
-
01-29-2013, 11:02 AM #1035
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
01-29-2013, 11:04 AM #1036
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
01-29-2013, 11:06 AM #1037
Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 945
- Rep Points
- 667.6
- Mentioned
- 8 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 7
-
01-29-2013, 11:10 AM #1038
Supporting Vendor

- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Location
- Simi Valley, CA
- Posts
- 3,870
- Rep Points
- 4,010.4
- Mentioned
- 156 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 41
Given the power curve of the single I think 3.46 gears are a must have for manual transmission cars. That change alone should net you 2-3mph.
Burger Motorsports
Home of the Worlds fastest N54s and N55s!
N54 Overall Traps World Record (11.33@132.78)__N54 Stock Turbos WR (11.25@122.86)__N54 AT Stock Turbos Traps WR (11.38@125.24)__N54 Twin Turbos WR (11.01@129.30)__N54 Stock Turbos 60-130 WR (8.39)__N54 Stock Turbos WHP WR (456whp)__N54 Stock Turbos+n2o WHP WR (542whp)__N54 Stock Turbos+n2o 60-130 WR (6.95)__N54 Stock Turbos+n2o WR (11.11@129.47)__N55 WR (11.91@117.81)__N55 WHP WR (399whp)__F30 WR(11.99@114.35)
-
01-29-2013, 11:17 AM #1039
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
exactly what I'm thinking.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 11:20 AM #1040
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Had no timing in 4th on this one. Think I shifted too quickly.
Also, notice there is a little bit of bog on 3-4 in both graphs. I could feel this at the track.
I'm not using NLS on any of these runs (did it on my first run, but timing flatlined so I took it off - still seemed to happen on the above run).
-
01-29-2013, 11:23 AM #1041
Nice to get more slips, thanks. ~124 traps, interesting.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 11:28 AM #1042
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
01-29-2013, 11:35 AM #1043
Hopefully people realize Vbox times are not track times. Hotrod used to do that nonsense and it was hilarious to watch him claim records based on inflated Vbox BS.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 11:38 AM #1044
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 265
- Rep Points
- 240.0
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
At my track here in Orlando, my VBOX would always be dead on with my slip. Not at PBIR though. I'm not sure if my VBOX is out of calibration or if the track is. Unfortunately, I forgot to ask my friend to check his VBOX against his slips so I dont' have a 2nd point of reference.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I'll probably go to Bradenton's track soon. I'll check my VBOX against the slips there and see if my VBOX is messed up or if PBIR is.
-
01-29-2013, 11:41 AM #1045
It will likely vary based on location, elevation, conditions. The point ultimately being a Vbox isn't equal to a slip.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 12:11 PM #1046Fair enough, I could just imagine the $#@! storm it would stir up if you did though. Keep us posted, thanks!This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
01-29-2013, 12:11 PM #1047
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 1,554
- Rep Points
- 1,151.3
- Mentioned
- 6 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 12
-
01-29-2013, 12:12 PM #1048Exactly... IHRA sanctioned track equipment is going to be more trustworthy than a box in the car.This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote'06 987 S
-
01-29-2013, 12:13 PM #1049
Pretty close, but what's disturbing is his 1/8mi ET. It's not good. I would think even after the bad 60' he should pick up more time on the front end.
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
New Project? 2.4L long rod motor for my EVO
03 Evo 8 HTA35r: Blown Motor
e92 335i JB4 G5 ISO + BMS Flash, RB Turbos, FBO + Meth SOLD
-
01-29-2013, 12:23 PM #1050sorry, not following the statement, you know you can change gears right..?This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote...If people appreciate a very high level of engineering, a power delivery with excellent response, lots of low-mid rpm torque combined with a powerful non stop top end , appreciate the air to air setup... then this is kit will interest them...


Reply With Quote





Bookmarks