Close

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 176
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    or you can go by the fact that (OE) has some of the, if not the fastest performing cars around..

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,089
    Rep Points
    999.1
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    If you're comparing their NA tunes vs this platform they're completely different. Show me 470 whp fully bolted on race/meth with stock turbos on a dynojet with an expected baseline and I'll be impressed.

    A full datalog indicating the car is happy and isn't a glory run would also be appreciated.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,738
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    or you can go by the fact that (OE) has some of the, if not the fastest performing cars around..
    You would figure that somebody who has been in the community for this long would understand what is expected/possible/claimed out of the n54 platform by now.

    In other words, CMON man comparing other platforms to the one we are currently discussing is pointless. Why dont you pm boom and ask him of his opinion on oe tuning and their tune. He owned it, tracked it, flipped a $#@! over it ect ect.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    878
    Rep Points
    891.7
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by nafoo Click here to enlarge
    Is this correct?

    Mustang (lowest)
    Dynapack (middle of the road)
    Dynojet (highest)

    I will be very interested in this tune if it's making ~367hp/tq tune only, no mods, with only 13.5 psi.
    A dynapack at 1.0 reads very similar to a dynojet with a nod more torque.

    No comments on the Fbo cobb @19psi peak making 365 tapering up top (like i said it did) ?

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,089
    Rep Points
    999.1
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by BrenM3 Click here to enlarge
    A dynapack at 1.0 reads very similar to a dynojet with a nod more torque.

    No comments on the cobb making 365 tapering up top (like i said it did) ?
    That 365 is SAE correction right? If so makes sense.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,738
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by BrenM3 Click here to enlarge
    A dynapack at 1.0 reads very similar to a dynojet with a nod more torque.

    No comments on the Fbo cobb @19psi peak making 365 tapering up top (like i said it did) ?
    The fully bolted mods on that car really shine with raised boost, especially on the top end, but that should be given as common sense.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    ok, so, show me how many n54's have OE tune so far. This one, makes good power. especially since showing a baseline run, and even better when shown against an FBO car, 19psi, no matter what mods had better be 390+HP, regardless..

    all im saying is yes, i want to see some performance #'s as well, as Im sketical of Brens dyno as it is, but not of OE's ability to get 38x hp

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,738
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I already asked if anyone was running the tune in jersey. I am always down for a friendly run.
    As for cobb, all the stage 2 cars seem to be hitting 380ish plus or minus 10 with 1 135 user hitting over 410, however alof of them are trapping alot higher then expected, higher then their dyno number shows so I am not sure what to think of that. My pump gas trap was identical my my fbo meth/race/ 19psi procede trap that dynos over 420. Make of that what you want, but glory runs and sustanting power throughout gears are two very different things. Hence the reason I always ask for mulitple gear logs if people have problems, not some bs 3rd gear runs that last all of 5-7 seconds.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    878
    Rep Points
    891.7
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Laloosh Click here to enlarge
    The fully bolted mods on that car really shine with raised boost, especially on the top end, but that should be given as common sense.
    But they aren't shining up top.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    557
    Rep Points
    785.8
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by BrenM3 Click here to enlarge
    But they aren't shining up top.
    If you're running more aggressive than COBB up top then I want to see a log. You think it's good for a car with minimal mods to run more aggressive than a FBO?
    Click here to enlarge

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    878
    Rep Points
    891.7
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by LostMarine Click here to enlarge
    ok, so, show me how many n54's have OE tune so far. This one, makes good power. especially since showing a baseline run, and even better when shown against an FBO car, 19psi, no matter what mods had better be 390+HP, regardless..

    all im saying is yes, i want to see some performance #'s as well, as Im sketical of Brens dyno as it is, but not of OE's ability to get 38x hp
    Common sense has landed. Thanks LM

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    878
    Rep Points
    891.7
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Brey335i Click here to enlarge
    If you're running more aggressive than COBB up top then I want to see a log. You think it's good for a car with minimal mods to run more aggressive than a FBO?
    So, because it makes more power its more aggressive and unsafe? Great logic. It runs a richer afr and less boost. The Cobb car appeared to pull timing up top and get lumpy with repeated runs even with the fmic. That is the cleanest cold pass posted. The OE 135i hotlapped 5x made the same power and curve on stock fmic. JM2C.

    Dont get it twisted. We sell Cobb too. We are built from Japanese car tuning. No bias. Love the cobbs boost curves. Just a brief comparison.

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    13,460
    Rep Points
    58.0
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by BrenM3 Click here to enlarge
    Common sense has landed. Thanks LM
    Dont get too excited.. I do have my doubts about your dyno. but a comparison holds some water with me..

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,677
    Rep Points
    3,327.5
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    34


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Does OE have a money back guarantee so ppl can try it for 30 days like many other tunes?
    Click here to enlarge

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,738
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by dzenno Click here to enlarge
    Does OE have a money back guarantee so ppl can try it for 30 days like many other tunes?
    If they do I can dattalog the $#@! out of this thing as well as run it at the track.
    Still didn't get an answer to if any owner live in the jersey area. We can see if my 5 extra wheel hp will make it a race lol. IM going to bet buslenghts by 130, just a guess though

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,089
    Rep Points
    999.1
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    If they got a 30 day money back trial count me in as well. I'll also datalog the heck out of it and also run it at the track.

    If they can remap the TCU logic I would even keep it provided they have a race map.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,682
    Rep Points
    31,529.0
    Mentioned
    2062 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Laloosh Click here to enlarge
    There lies your problem personal opinion vs fact
    On with the neg reps. You guys can do better then that
    My problem is not paying attention to my own experience with OE Tuning vs. your lack of experience with them? That makes sense.

  18. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,682
    Rep Points
    31,529.0
    Mentioned
    2062 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by nafoo Click here to enlarge
    Is this correct?

    Mustang (lowest)
    Dynapack (middle of the road)
    Dynojet (highest)

    I will be very interested in this tune if it's making ~367hp/tq tune only, no mods, with only 13.5 psi.
    That isn't a rule but generally graphs go Mustang lower, Dynojet mid-high, and dynapack highest from what I have seen. These can all change depending on a variety of factors.

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,682
    Rep Points
    31,529.0
    Mentioned
    2062 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Laloosh Click here to enlarge
    In other words, CMON man comparing other platforms to the one we are currently discussing is pointless.
    Not at all especially when as a whole you disparaged OE Tuning without even having knowledge of their work with other platforms. A very narrow scope being applied solely by you.

  20. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,682
    Rep Points
    31,529.0
    Mentioned
    2062 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by BrenM3 Click here to enlarge
    Common sense has landed. Thanks LM
    Sorry if this was mentioned earlier but is this a custom dyno tune you are displaying or a canned tune?

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,682
    Rep Points
    31,529.0
    Mentioned
    2062 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    316


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by dzenno Click here to enlarge
    Does OE have a money back guarantee so ppl can try it for 30 days like many other tunes?
    Good question, I should know the answer but I don't. Eurocharged does offer a 7 day guarantee I believe.

    E-mail sales@oetuning.com to find out if you don't want to wait for a response in the thread.

  22. #72
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,677
    Rep Points
    3,327.5
    Mentioned
    225 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    34


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I emailed them a few months back but didn't get a response back...can they not respond to this thread?
    Click here to enlarge

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,738
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    My problem is not paying attention to my own experience with OE Tuning vs. your lack of experience with them? That makes sense.
    No your problem is thinking you know something about the n54 oe tuning tune, when you dont even own the car, but you will twist words to favor you like usual....and begin.
    Pm boom, ask him about his experience and results. focusing on results from other platforms and applying them to this one is as dumb as it gets.

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,089
    Rep Points
    999.1
    Mentioned
    104 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    sticky, I understand you have a vested interest in OE tuning so I can't blame you for coming to their defense. However, results in NA tuning don't mean squat on this platform where everything possible from a tuning standpoint has been explored.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    324
    Rep Points
    467.6
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I am curious as to why Jeremy maxed out at 13.5 psi. Oh wait. No I'm not.

    I would assume that the advance is ramped up and the he's trying to keep it cool with 11.2 afr.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •