Close

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 96
  1. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    25
    Rep Points
    50.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    This car was taken off and my M3 straped down.
    The computer was not touched.
    Hell they where still in the "George's M Coupe" folder cause i forgot to make a new one. And my first run i made only 350whp. Still think their dyno is off?

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,076
    Rep Points
    31,288.5
    Mentioned
    2053 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    313


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by roadkill1991 Click here to enlarge
    This car was taken off and my M3 straped down.
    The computer was not touched.
    Hell they where still in the "George's M Coupe" folder cause i forgot to make a new one. And my first run i made only 350whp. Still think their dyno is off?
    It's a conspiracy, clearly.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,643
    Rep Points
    2,262.8
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    23


    3 out of 3 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Its been asked several times but it has been ignored so I will ask it again: has this car been down the 1/4mi&if so what are the trap speeds?
    IMO thats the only dyno that matters
    Click here to enlarge

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    25
    Rep Points
    50.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    It's a conspiracy, clearly.
    hahaha

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,076
    Rep Points
    31,288.5
    Mentioned
    2053 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    313


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I was sent a video of this car before the new turbo upgrade running a 176 whp modified R1. It's a flyby video so tough to see what is going on but looks like they are neck and neck:


  6. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    It looks like the Coupe is alittle ahead..
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Points
    460.0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    0 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    no 1/4 videos ever out of ICS on there magical M poop

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 600whp S4 Click here to enlarge
    no 1/4 videos ever out of ICS on there magical M poop
    Well you are wrong that ICS stage 1 or was it 2 car ran 10's. The yellow 1, but nothing from this M coupe.
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,076
    Rep Points
    31,288.5
    Mentioned
    2053 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    313


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 600whp S4 Click here to enlarge
    no 1/4 videos ever out of ICS on there magical M poop
    They have run the 1/4 and set some nice times, just not with this car with this current setup I believe.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,643
    Rep Points
    2,262.8
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    23


    Reputation: Yes | No
    $#@!ty vid but if you pause it at just the right time the car is definitely ahead...R1s are slow anywaysClick here to enlarge
    Click here to enlarge

  11. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Points
    460.0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GG///M3 Click here to enlarge
    Well you are wrong that ICS stage 1 or was it 2 car ran 10's. The yellow 1, but nothing from this M coupe.
    I was stating no 1/4 out of any of the m coupe set ups

  12. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 600whp S4 Click here to enlarge
    I was stating no 1/4 out of any of the m coupe set ups
    Yes very correct sir.
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  13. #63
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    336
    Rep Points
    345.9
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4


    Reputation: Yes | No
    What are the 1/4 mile times of the cars ICS puts out then? At least if we know their numbers, we can assume what this car will run.

    Very stout numbers, BTW.
    his: _______________ hers: Mitsubishi Evolution X
    gone: R35 GT-R,
    C6 Z06, V2 CTS-V, E60 M5 SMG, CLK500

  14. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ItalianStallion Click here to enlarge
    What are the 1/4 mile times of the cars ICS puts out then? At least if we know their numbers, we can assume what this car will run.

    Very stout numbers, BTW.
    9's, and 10's I believe on e36 m3's. 1 with no interior, and the 10 sec car full interior.
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  15. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    336
    Rep Points
    345.9
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GG///M3 Click here to enlarge
    9's, and 10's I believe on e36 m3's. 1 with no interior, and the 10 sec car full interior.
    10's with full interior...low or high 10's? pump or c16/ms109? how much power? Thanks bro
    his: _______________ hers: Mitsubishi Evolution X
    gone: R35 GT-R,
    C6 Z06, V2 CTS-V, E60 M5 SMG, CLK500

  16. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,076
    Rep Points
    31,288.5
    Mentioned
    2053 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    313


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ItalianStallion Click here to enlarge
    10's with full interior...low or high 10's? pump or c16/ms109? how much power? Thanks bro
    Yes, please share the full specs.

  17. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Yes, please share the full specs.
    There is a thread some where in this section about that setup with a video. I think it trapped a 14xmph
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  18. #68
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    522
    Rep Points
    122.9
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No

  19. #69
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    885
    Rep Points
    8.0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    It's a conspiracy, clearly.
    A couple years ago Multiplex car made 560 rwhp (there abouts) on ICS dyno with stock S52 cams. He put in billet Bav Sol cams. Fuel table required a lot of fuel after that (indicating more air flow) and we dyno'd together on the same day on a dynojet (same as ICS) and he put down 550 rwhp.

    Do the mathz.


  20. #70
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    104
    Rep Points
    41.2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 5mall5nail5 Click here to enlarge
    A couple years ago Multiplex car made 560 rwhp (there abouts) on ICS dyno with stock S52 cams. He put in billet Bav Sol cams. Fuel table required a lot of fuel after that (indicating more air flow) and we dyno'd together on the same day on a dynojet (same as ICS) and he put down 550 rwhp.

    Do the mathz.
    I've also seen similar numbers between ICS dyno and another nearby DynoJet. 19psi on ICS dyno read ~100hp above another local dynojet @ 20psi on the exact same car.

  21. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,076
    Rep Points
    31,288.5
    Mentioned
    2053 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    313


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 5mall5nail5 Click here to enlarge
    A couple years ago Multiplex car made 560 rwhp (there abouts) on ICS dyno with stock S52 cams. He put in billet Bav Sol cams. Fuel table required a lot of fuel after that (indicating more air flow) and we dyno'd together on the same day on a dynojet (same as ICS) and he put down 550 rwhp.

    Do the mathz.
    Seems there is conflicting evidence from both sides.

  22. #72
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,716
    Rep Points
    826.2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I've used this dyno, there's nothing fishy about it.. I made 412whp on 14.5 psi fully bolted and rb turbos
    JB4LIFE

  23. #73
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
    Posts
    3,053
    Rep Points
    1,236.6
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by 5mall5nail5 Click here to enlarge
    A couple years ago Multiplex car made 560 rwhp (there abouts) on ICS dyno with stock S52 cams. He put in billet Bav Sol cams. Fuel table required a lot of fuel after that (indicating more air flow) and we dyno'd together on the same day on a dynojet (same as ICS) and he put down 550 rwhp.

    Do the mathz.
    Just had to say, badass sig.

    Back to ICS dyno......

  24. #74
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,076
    Rep Points
    31,288.5
    Mentioned
    2053 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    313


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I have received some additional details on this car from an anonymous source.

    I wish to throw nobody under the bus and simply have the correct info presented.

    I do not know if this information is accurate but to allow posters to decide for themselves it is my responsibility to provide it to you.

    I have been told the car was running MS109. Additionally, it has ported cylinder heads and Schrick cams. The car was tuned by Felix Medina who is known as Gato and does aggressive tuning work (sometimes too aggressive) in the Honda world.

    Up to you to decide if it is true and any of these claims are welcome to be challenged.

  25. #75
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    275
    Rep Points
    120.2
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Sticky STOP the DRAMA BS, The car made 820 WHP Today and 688 RWT on a Moderate Race Fuel Map (Tweaked by my close friend Felix), 2 degrees of timing above over 6000 RPM and leaned it out a bit. The car has 60-70 WHP in her before upgrading the turbo's in which I will be doing very soon over the next few weeks.

    The car always had a worked head and a set of Shrick Camshafts,,, Anything you want to know? The car holds power right to 7500 RPM and does not lay down !

    -George Kakaletris

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •