Search:

Hmm in order for something to be strong it must withstand a certain force......Just pointing out the obvious.

Your logic stated a 1.9x 60 foot time and a 12.19 timeslip. Then you claimed but never showed 1.7 60 foot time but did not hit 11s despite trap speed only being off by 1 mph. Your math is not...

Negative captain. Try again. By your logic a mid 600 whp m3 should run 9s cause other cars can. ONE m3 ran 11s at a bull$#@! track. ONE, like the amount of people who agree with you, or the brain...

Hmm ironically ive had that happen everytime I prove someone wrong. Must be sticky glitch in the software.

Lol the m3 runs 11s bro, not one has done it on a real track though. Did you hear the m3 with 600whp and a 130 trap can run 9s? Other cars can, so the m3 must be able to run it as well. In for the...

The problem is that the m3 has yet to drop the 60 a tenth or two, especially a NA one. And the only one who claims they ran a 1.7 60 and 114mph trap speed will not reveal the ET because ironically...

I love how you stop answering when I proove you wrong. Keep it up.

Pop Quiz: Car A and B are identical aside from gearing. During Max acceleration Car A can make it in 4th gear to 1000' feet, anything after that it needs 5th. Car B can make it in 4th gear till...

Sticky fails to realize that his gearing and TQ multiplicationg is greater everywhere aside from the last shift, which has minimal affect on ET in a 1/4 mile race.
What was the ET sticky? Still...

Gearing still got you the 114 trap speed correct? From point A to point B that car still went 0-114 mph correct? Point proven. IF it invoved an extra shift, which according to you the M3 does it...

1 second fastern than a NA m3, not 1 second faster then my stock tire time. Nice try though

So in summary sticky says a m3 will run 11.9 @ 115 with a 1.7 60, yet his with a 1.7 60 and 114 trap...

Once again, ONE m3 ran 11s at a bull$#@! track and that has yet to be matched, however that was at a higher trap speed, which once again is yet to be matched.
Until some one does it, it hasnt...

So what was the ET sticky? You keep avoiding the answer because it is the key to this discussion.

So you geared to to help it get out the hole confirming what I said previously. What was the ET with that 114 trap speed and 1.7 60?

Post the timeslip of your 1.7 run. Why are you hiding it? Is it because the car ran slower than it did with a 1.9 60? Would like an educational lesson of how trap speed has far less affect on et...

you posted ZERO evidence. You posted some a 12.1 @ 115 time slip with a 1.9 60 on drag radials. Then you claimed you hit a 1.7 after a line lock but ran in worse DA. Based on the .1 off the 60 is...

BOOM, LostMarine uses common sense again.

Sticky just shut me to $#@! up and post the 1.7 time slip. We both know whats going to happen, you are going to look foolish in one way or another.

I dont care what you ran stock. I care what you ran when you hit a 1.7x 60. ONE m3 has run 11s stock at a bull$#@! inaccurate track and it did it at 118-119 mph. ZERO e9x m3s ran 11.9 @ 115 NA. ...

So we are in agreement that you will not post the actually time you ran when you hit that 1.7 60 NA? I love when you dig yourself in a hole and try to talk yourway out of it by dodging the...

Physical numbers, not theories. What did your car run when it ran a 1.7 60 foot time na. Fill in the X's

1.7X
12.XX @ 1XX.XX mph.
Posting a picture would be nicer.

I have been down the...

Once again dodging the qeustion. What did the car run with the 1.7 60 foot time, what was the mph. I will SCHOOL you in drag racing, and I have been down the strip many more times than you have in...

Dodging the question? Where is the NA slip where you hit a 1.7? No 11s sticky? Ricer math not adding up, or do you have some sort of excuse you didnt think of yet?

So where is you 11 second slip with that 1.7 NA?

What would happen, and what happened are two different things. Why do you think your car didnt hit a 1.7 on that run? Do you find it odd that the 1.7 you claim also happened when you were...

Its possible, two big guys, slow shifting, 7 year old car that might be a little beat up by now. Are you sure about the 08 plus being faster than the 06-07? That is news to me.