Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Last 7 Days Clear All
  • Grand_hustle17's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:55 PM
    Grand_hustle17 replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    :lol:
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:49 PM
    Welcome anatpitt769, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 0 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:31 PM
    Welcome khuongvan195x1, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 6 view(s)
  • JerryT's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:27 PM
    Contact me asap!
    45 replies | 5158 view(s)
  • LQQKOUT's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:30 PM
    Nice find!
    2 replies | 125 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:06 PM
    Hey aolgauyndext4206: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 69 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:54 PM
    Hey adizzycswifty9492: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 75 view(s)
  • bigdnno98's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:47 PM
    bigdnno98 replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    I was being generous LOL.
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • Chris@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:40 PM
    Hell yeah! Turn 'em up!
    1 replies | 160 view(s)
  • The Convert's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:19 PM
    The Convert replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    Those kinds of numbers with such "low" power is a big reason I lowered my goals drastically from wanting to push power levels to planning for a very reliable and "easy" on the motor 550-600ish.
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:19 PM
    Hey pitttts719: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 79 view(s)
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:13 PM
    Terry@BMS replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    Lol so true... The 135 ran 11.1 with 450whp back on the day. :)
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:04 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    Linked you to a 4300+ pound chassis.
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:04 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread For Sale: FS: OEM PreLCI E92 Tail Lights in Buy/Sell - Parts
    GLWS
    1 replies | 148 view(s)
  • Grand_hustle17's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:03 PM
    Grand_hustle17 replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    In a really light chassis.. but for the most part its 10's
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:01 PM
    Sticky replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    140 is enough for 9's... in anything other than a BMW. Notable exception: http://www.boostaddict.com/content.php?6883-F10-M5-into-the-9-s-BimmerBoost-member-sets-a-new-S63TU-record-running-9-9-140-in-the-1-4-mile
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • The Convert's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:50 PM
    As soon as I wrote stock fuel system I new I should have changed it. Lol. I just think of the stage 3 non PI setup as stock now because it's so simple and easy.
    24 replies | 966 view(s)
  • Chris@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:49 PM
    Whoah! Bored on a Saturday I see. A week or so ago we had injector #2 leak where the top screws into the body. It lit off and Tony put it out quickly, but it crisped up a few things, a coil being one of them. No prototype fuel system on the car when that happened or now -completely unrelated. Just glad that Tony's quick action minimized any potential damage. Normally people use faulty hardware as an excuse for low numbers. These are the highest twin numbers ever posted, that's without all hardware being perfect. Can't win them all I suppose. Chris
    24 replies | 966 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:48 PM
    We all know the Tesla Model S P100D is quick off the line. GPS test numbers showed 0-60 in 2.5 seconds and 0-100 in 6.5. The 1/4 mile trap speed on the VBOX used for the GPS numbers showed 124.5 GPS trap speed timing often inflates trap speeds versus real world drag strip numbers. That is the case here. The Tesla is still fast but on an actual strip runs 10.825 @ 122.93. The Huracan manages 10.843 @ 127.23. The two cars and very close and it really comes down to reaction time for the win. The Tesla is hard to beat right off the line but you can see just how much harder the Huracan is pulling past the 1/8 mile. From a roll, the Tesla has no chance. Certainly impressive performance from the P100D but it is a bit of a one trick pony.
    14 replies | 67 view(s)
  • Grand_hustle17's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:45 PM
    Grand_hustle17 replied to a thread Single turbo sizing in N54
    All thise other things that inflate the numbers never really count for me personally.. what counts is what the drag strip says.. a lot of these things try to use math to make the numbers more than what they are. 11's is more than enough. The trap is one of a 10 sec vehicle anyways which is really all that matters on the street and more "real world" event. Whats "140'ish"?
    83 replies | 5464 view(s)
  • Young_man's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:30 PM
    My GC's have been installed for nearly 3 months now with no issues at all and as of right now I'm targeting 23lbs of boost on 93 pump and the car feels AMAZING. There isn't much action where I live so once a friend told me that guys from out of town were looking to come to us for some action, I was all in. The owner of a white ZL1 Camaro (unknown mods) came up to me asking what all I had done and I gave the same response I always give.. "Some bolt-on's and a tune"... He responded with "so about 400 maybe" and then asked if I wanted to run. I kinda felt like he was hoping to play bully but it didn't work in his favor lol. We did 3 runs before the night was over.. A 40 roll and 2 digs. Each race just ended worse for him. He wanted to run a 4th time but I told him I was done for the night. With that being said, I know some of you have your issues with Tony but VTT puts out products that perform excellent and I'm glad I was patient when it came to deciding which route I wanted to go with my turbo upgrades. Now on to the only half way decent video my friend recorded of one of my runs with the ZL1. *All footage was recorded in Mexico*
    1 replies | 160 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    724 replies | 152272 view(s)
  • Chris@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:07 PM
    Stock motor? Same power but I'd be careful on how much torque you dial in. Stock fuel system? On e85? You gonna run out o' fuel in a hurry son. I know you know this. :) This car has the single barrel shotgun and PI running -no prototype dual hpfp business. Any high horsepower car on e85 is going to need a healthy fuel system. A few guys pushing limits on stock hpfp running c16 have great numbers but that's a whole different ball game. Thanks for your kind words! Chris
    24 replies | 966 view(s)
  • 08_335i's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:42 PM
    08_335i replied to a thread 765 whp! VTT GC Dyno Update in N54
    Numbers are nice, I was a bit mislead by the words you used. You made it sound like the coil was knowingly toasted but kept on using it because it worked "fine" under lower boost. None the less, it's a very nice dyno for twins. Edit: was the fire caused by the 1 of a kind fueling system we're all curiously waiting\hoping to be released? ;)
    24 replies | 966 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:32 PM
    Hey bobbychvsy2853: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 96 view(s)
  • V8Bait's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:10 PM
    V8Bait replied to a thread 765 whp! VTT GC Dyno Update in N54
    Lol it's cool, I'm not really defensive, but I'm just not following you. Sure it was a little krispy. And before he broke 700whp it was fine. All i know is i got a text around that run that it developed a misfire under load, he said it was one if the coils. He replaced it and continued. Sometimes these things happen, but please tell me how you can verify a coil will work at 700whp by testing it at 500whp? I just don't understand, I'm not being defensive. You can't judge a coil by how it looks... is that wrong to say? Edit- maybe you confused when I said known burnt as meaning known bad. By known burnt, i mean it had some heat deformation from his engine fire. He replaced a few parts after the fire but not everything, as that would generally be considered a waste. It was functioning, however. I also don't think this qualifies as a "big dyno day" or whatever, hell I was sitting for my boards (9 hour test) and he just rolled the car on to see what it would do post fire. That's all I have to say on that matter, I thought the numbers were pretty nice consisting all of the above :)
    24 replies | 966 view(s)
More Activity