Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Popular Forums Last 7 Days Clear All
  • Chris@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    09-23-2016, 02:49 PM
    Hey guys, We got the white car (6MT) back up and running strong and thought we'd revisit some GC numbers for your viewing pleasure. Car specs: Built Short block Stock head with bad valve guide seals GC turbos BMS DP's Custom Exhaust dual 3" into 4" Shotgun Single Barrel VTT Rear Silicone intake Custom VTT front intake VTT DCI Custom VTT Catch can set up EOS Intake manifold with built in PI Custom LPFP set up 100% E85 for fuel MHD tune by V8bait FLASH ONLY ADE Intercooler AEM AQ1 data logging set up with Dual EGT, Dual BP, Manifold Pressure, FMIC In / out temps 6MT (4th gear logs) Numbers: Now, on to the numbers. Note that we're referencing boost from the AEM logs (screen shots attached) in lieu of MHD reading it in the charge pipe, which isn't accurate. The AEM map sensor is calibrated and tested to be accurate. Datazap of course references the MHD values for those who care. 765 was made on 29.3 psi at redline 740 was made on 28.5 psi at redline 693 was made on 25.4 psi at redline 655 was made on 22.8 psi at redline Dyno Charts: 765 whp dyno: 740 whp dyno: All 4 dynos on one graph: AEM Screenshots: 765 whp AEM Screenshot: 740 whp AEM Screenshot: 693 whp AEM Screenshot: 655 whp AEM Screenshot: These numbers speak for themselves, but any comments from competitors or their pawns about these reaching a bottle neck around 650 whp should be recognized as the marketing gibberish that it is. These turbos are very efficient. 600 wtq at 3500 rpm and no wheel spin on the dyno! Datazap links: 765WHP - http://www.datazap.me/u/vargasturbotech/gc-testing-09-23-16-02?log=0&data=4-23&zoom=24-80 740WHP - http://www.datazap.me/u/vargasturbotech/gc-testing-09-23-16-01?log=0&data=4-23&zoom=26-83 693WHP - http://www.datazap.me/u/vargasturbotech/gc-testing-09-23-16-01?log=2&data=4-23&zoom=34-100 655WHP - http://www.datazap.me/u/vargasturbotech/gc-testing-09-23-16-01?log=1&data=4-23&zoom=31-95 MHD Logs: Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xd5-sOxQYY4&feature=youtu.be (sorry for poor quality vid)
    61 replies | 2787 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:51 AM
    Now this is a hell of an achievement. To put it into perspective this is power equal to a built motor ESS VT3 supercharger setup except achieved on a stock internal S65 V8 and with far more torque. Quite simply, turbos are far better for the S65 V8 platform than centrifugal blowers. Why? Greater efficiency and less stress. Rather than manually spinning an impeller and increasing stress on the front of the motor the exhaust gasses are doing the work but you already knew turbos were more efficient. In the S65 V8 application you get the benefit of being able to push harder in the power and torque department on the stock internals. 708 wheel horsepower and 495 lb-ft of torque at the wheels are stock internal S65 V8 records: No doubt 100% E85 fuel helps here as well. The fuel system is upgraded for this of course. What turbos and how much boost? A pair of GT3076's at 11 psi of boost. These turbos obviously can be pushed much harder but the question would be how much further before the engine let's go? Who wants to find out? Just look at the curve. It's a thing of beauty. Yes, it is purposely tuned to not have a huge torque hit down low (they considered other turbochargers for this application) and offer nice and flat torque delivery once spooled until redline. Just imagine what a built motor curve with double the boost pressure will look like. This is also tuned on the stock DME as well which is truly remarkable and shows considerable skill and experience with the factory ECU. The S65 V8 turbo era is officially here.
    25 replies | 254 view(s)
  • AWSAWS's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:54 AM
    With the carbon buildup issue that some direct injection gasoline engines are suffering from (Not sure if later GDI designs took steps to reduce this, like special coatings?) is there any quick and easy way to check the intake valves without pulling so much hardware off. For example, could the silicon elbow be removed from the charge pipe and a bore scope threaded up past the thottle body? Will the TB be closed when the engine is off? (I'm not an expert). I'd like to get mine cleaned if it's needed but I'd hate to book it in and have all the bits taken off to find it's fairly clean. I run meth and an oil catch can. Sometimes E85 mixes.
    18 replies | 664 view(s)
  • bradsm87's Avatar
    09-22-2016, 06:56 AM
    I know a lot of cars do have a tendency to have a nasty single knock on one or two cylinders when grabbing the next gear suddenly. I don't want to take any timing out there because it doesn't knock there when in steady state. I'm tempted to lower spark retard intensity 1 & 2 as we all know a -10 degree timing pull (ALL of the timing advance) is excessive for ANY knock event. I do like the feeling of having a huge safety margin though. Are there any other/better tricks? http://datazap.me/u/bradsm87/rev25?log=0&data=4-8-9-10-11-12-13-22-26&zoom=428-466
    14 replies | 1246 view(s)
  • NJ-M4's Avatar
    09-25-2016, 11:32 PM
    Made 4 consecutive 10 second passes today. Best was 10.877. Props to Kevin Baldi at Precision Tuning in Spotswood, NJ. He's the man. Xona Turbos / JB4 / Precision Tuning Custom Tune & Flash by Kevin Baldi / AEM Meth Kit / Dodson Sportsman Clutch Packs / DSS 1200 hp axles / ER Downpipes / ER Chargepipes / Maximum PSI Intake. Runs were made on Mickey Thompson ET Street S/S 305 35 18s.
    15 replies | 471 view(s)
  • The Convert's Avatar
    09-25-2016, 01:28 PM
    The Convert started a thread MHD question in N54
    So, I'm getting ready to switch to MHD from the Cobb AP. The AP is still married to the car at the moment, but I want to get my "licenses" purchased so I have everything ready to make the switch. When I connected my tablet to the car I got the error below when trying to access the MHD store. Is this because the AP is still married to the car, or is my cable, also shown below, the problem? For reference, I have used that cable before for connecting to the car to code injectors. Any help is appreciated.
    13 replies | 652 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    09-24-2016, 04:48 PM
    We all know the Tesla Model S P100D is quick off the line. GPS test numbers showed 0-60 in 2.5 seconds and 0-100 in 6.5. The 1/4 mile trap speed on the VBOX used for the GPS numbers showed 124.5 GPS trap speed timing often inflates trap speeds versus real world drag strip numbers. That is the case here. The Tesla is still fast but on an actual strip runs 10.825 @ 122.93. The Huracan manages 10.843 @ 127.23. The two cars and very close and it really comes down to reaction time for the win. The Tesla is hard to beat right off the line but you can see just how much harder the Huracan is pulling past the 1/8 mile. From a roll, the Tesla has no chance. Certainly impressive performance from the P100D but it is a bit of a one trick pony.
    16 replies | 250 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:06 AM
    The N55 motor is coming into its own. After years of hiding in the N54's shadow the BMW N55 3.0 liter I6 turbo motor is earning respect. Just look at what Enzo Performance with their single turbo kit using a Garrett GT3586 turbocharger is getting out of the motor. 632 horsepower and 525 lb-ft of torque at the wheels: Yes, that is with port fuel injection. Keep in mind this is hardly the end of the line as they are achieving these numbers on 25 psi of boost. Further details below. Sorry for the delay. Just gathering all the bits and pieces of the kit we need to get these rolling out. For starters we have been getting a lot calls regarding how our kit compares to other "bolt-on" stock replacement turbochargers. The very simple response is it doesn't, in anyway. 1. For starters our package removes/disables the electronic waste-gate(EWG), factory Diverter Valve and MAF sensor. Our unique ECU Calibration allows for a CEL Free operation, no drive-train malfunctions, no faults with added use of a TiAL wastegate and an optional TiAL BOV. The ECU calibration allows for a MAFless operation that now uses speed density (MAP Sensor). 2. Our Tubular Manifold utilizes a V-Band flange. Making switching turbine housings possible along with changing complete turbo assemblies, GT30,GT35,GT40 etc. Did we mention our manifold is completely designed and fabricated in house. 3. The Garrett 3586 included in our kit comes alive at 25 psi (it can operate upwards up to 40 psi) 4. All oil and coolant lines are custom assembled in house using only the best AN hoses and fittings. We decided to go with AN due to the reliability and flexibility of changing line configuration depending of vehicle model. 5. At low boost (16-18psi) we experienced 560whp, 26psi psi, 632whp. With proper fuel, ignition, clutch, engine upgrades power levels closer to 750-800hp are completely possible. Our kit will include the following. -3586 Ball Bearing Turbocharger -Enzo Performance Tubular Manifold -Custom Coolant and Oil Lines/AN Fittings -Custom downpipe/Wastegate dump and hardware -Enzo Performance Custom ECU Calibration. -TiAL Wastegate and optional BOV -Custom Charge and intake Piping with High Flow Air-filter. -Hallman-Pro Boost Controller with Vacuum fittings and Lines We are limiting our Group Buy purchase price to the first 20 participants. We already have a few names on the list so please email info@enzoperformance.com if you are seriously considering our package. Current group buy pricing will begin at $7685. Expect that number to approach closer to $9650 when the group buy is over. For any questions please give us a call 631-920-6699 or email us today. We look forward to pushing the N55 platform, please join us Oct 2nd Sunday BBQ for a more in depth look into our turbo kit. Recommended supporting modifications. -Port injection -Enzo Performance TiAL BOV kit -Upgraded In-tank E85 Fuel Pump -JB4 For logging and Map switching @info@enzoperformance
    15 replies | 90 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    09-24-2016, 01:40 AM
    With MotorTrend wrapping up their Best Driver's Car 2016 competition having all the cars together provides for a great opportunity to do a big drag race. They have been doing this every year for the past six years following the competition and who can blame them for the extra content? Obviously, some of these cars are more at home on the roadcourse (*cough* Viper ACR *cough*) than the dragstrip and that should be the focus but this drag race is undeniably fun. While they call this the world's greatest drag race (such creative self-promotion guys) it does not take place on an actual prepped drag strip. They use the tarmac at the defunct El Toro airbase in Irvine, California. This surface does not lend itself well to the rear wheel drive cars and MotorTrend doesn't seem capable of putting on the world's best roll on race to get both perspectives. Ok, ok, enough nitpicking but it is important to highlight the conditions in a drag race. They throw in a Charger Hellcat and cut the Aston Martin (lame) for good measure and we're off. No surprise that on the dusty old runway the all wheel drive vehicles lead of the line. Now, as this is not done a dragstrip do not take these 1/4 mile times as representative of what you can hit on the strip. They are timing the cars electronically and the times are inflated due to this. We have yet to see a stock Huracan or R8 V10 Plus top 130 in the 1/4 mile on the dragstrip. Now, due to the traction issues let's list the cars in order of trap speed to truly get an idea of who is the fastest in a straight line: McLaren 570S - 132.0 Audi R8 V10+ - 130.3 AMG GT-S - 126.7 Viper ACR - 124.7 Acura NSX - 123.6 Nissan GT-R - 123.4 Jag F-type SVR - 122.7 Porsche 911S - 120.5 Shelby GT350R - 118.9 BMW M4 GTS - 118.8 Camaro 1LE - 114.2 The 570S is the real straight line champ and if you actually properly launch it you will watch it destroy an R8 V10 Plus in a drag race.
    8 replies | 326 view(s)
  • bigdnno98's Avatar
    09-26-2016, 10:10 AM
    bigdnno98 started a thread For Sale: 2011 335is DCT in For Sale Vehicles
    Well, sadly it looks like Im going to have to either sell or part out the BMW. It is a 2011 BMW 335is DCT, with 71,000 miles. The car has a very good bumper to bumper warranty that is transferrable to the new owner. There are 27 months and 24,000 miles remaining on the warranty. Mods are below with prices, in the event of a part out. Asking $28,000 with all mods. JB4 G5-$350 MHD BEF with tablet and K Can cable-$50 BMS 2.2gal meth kit with FSB-$350 VRSF 7 FMIC-$250 VRSF 3 DPs-$250 BMS DCI-$50 Boostin Concpets stage 2 LPFP (Walbro 450 e85 pump) Not for sale Apex Arc 8 wheels with new Nitto Nitto NT555 G2 tires (17x9F, 17x9.5R)-$1,800 or $1000 + Good condition style 189 Spare BMW 18 style 264 wheels with Mickey Thompson ET Street Drag Radials-$800 New but not installed slotted rear rotors and pads-$200 Below are maintenance items replaced on the car: HPFP LPFP Battery and Cable Valve Cover Low Fuel Pressure Sensor 6 index 12 injectors 6 Coils New OEM Spark Plugs New Muffler
    6 replies | 443 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    09-23-2016, 05:10 AM
    That is according to MotorTrend of course. After the testing of the lap times at Laguna Seca and the subjective impressions were factored in McLaren's 570S came out on top. The BMW F82 M4 GTS on the other hand finished second to last and we can officially call the car a failure at this point. If you want to check out the laptimes and videos click here. The subjective impressions rank the cars as follows: 1st - McLaren 570S 2nd - Shelby GT350R 3rd - Porsche 911S 4th - Camaro 1LE 5th - Viper ACR 6th - AMG GT-S 7th - Audi R8 V10+ 8th - Acura NSX 9th - Jag F-type SVR 10th - Nissan GT-R 11th - BMW M4 GTS 12th - AM V12 Vantage S The Nissan GT-R in 10th place is about right considering it is a soulless robot that best excels at going from a dig with power upgrades. That's really where it has made its name and please do not act like it is a great driver's car or track weapon. It's a heavy soulless robot with little driver involvement. The McLaren 570S on the other hand is a lithe and technologically advanced driver's tool. It's also light at 3188 pounds and incredibly fast in a straight line. It's hard to beat but it also costs over $200k as tested. Yikes. 2016 McLaren 570S BASE PRICE $187,400 PRICE AS TESTED $219,770 VEHICLE LAYOUT Mid-engine, RWD, 2-pass, 2-door coupe ENGINE 3.8L/562-hp/443-lb-ft twin-turbo DOHC 32-valve V-8 TRANSMISSION 7-speed twin-clutch auto. CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,188 lb (42/58%) WHEELBASE 105.1 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 178.3 x 75.4 x 47.3 in 0-60 MPH 2.8 sec QUARTER MILE 10.7 sec @ 132.0 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 97 ft 0-100-0 MPH 10.1 sec LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.04 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.0 sec @ 0.93 g (avg) 2.2-MI ROAD COURSE LAP 94.58 sec EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 16/23/19 mpg ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 211/147 kW-hrs/100 miles CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB 1.05 lb/mile POWER @ RPM 562 hp @ 7,500 rpm TORQUE @ RPM 443 lb-ft @ 5,000 rpm SUSPENSION F;R Control arms, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; control arms, multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar BRAKES, F;R 15.5-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc; 15.0-in vented, drilled, carbon-ceramic disc, ABS Ferrari and Lamborghini wouldn't even play which makes us respect McLaren all that much more. Ferrari is simply a bitch when it comes to these comparisons. Unless they can control all the variables they won't participate. They are not run by enthusiasts and frankly do not deserve the business of enthusiasts. Posers on the other hand should continue to line up and bend over just to get f@#ked by dealers offering them the illusion that the artificially over inflated price they paid for their prancing horse is worth it. The overrated Italians are scared of the Viper ACR. They should be, it owned everyone. Ferrari even tries to hold it back. What a bunch of insecure Italian douchebags. Does the ACR really deserve to be 5th? Allow me to translate that for you: The Viper is loud and scary. It's the best driver's tool but we're a bunch of old men that have gone soft. We readily admit it's the best at doing what this competition is about, driving, but it's just too much car and too involving. Seriously, grow a pair MotorTrend. Reward Dodge for making a car that scared Ferrari and Lamborghini into staying home under the bed peeking out from time to time to make sure there isn't an ACR driving by. What about the F82 M4 GTS? Everyone should be sick and tired of hearing about this $134k failure from BMW. Just shut up about it already. It's hot garbage. The M in M4 GTS stands for Mistake not Motorsport. If that's the best BMW M can do for $134k when producing a dedicated high performance track car you might as well just shut the whole thing down and send everyone to work at 'i' instead. 'i' don't care anymore and neither should you. Let's to get real performance cars now and the one that should have won. The Shelby GT350R. Is it a higher performance driver's car than the McLaren 570S? No. Is it a better driver's car? Arguably, yes. When you factor in the amazing (and unique) powerplant along with the sticker price you scratch your head wondering how Ford pulled this car off. It's manual only. No dual clutch and no nonsense. Only real driver's should apply. Shouldn't that bump it up in a driver's car competition? How about that it beats up on more expensive cars? How about that it is the first production car with carbon fiber wheels? How about that the Americans are delivering engines that even Ferrari states are no longer economically feasible? Sure, it's not perfect but when you factor in the entire package the Shelby GT350R truly deserves the victory over something like the McLaren 570S that is purchased by spoiled brats. The fact it is American and the Americans are producing the best performance cars for the money today is just icing on the cake. The GT350R may not be MotorTrend's winner, but it's ours. 2016 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350R BASE PRICE $63,495 PRICE AS TESTED $66,990 VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 2-pass, 2-door coupe ENGINE 5.2L/526-hp/429-lb-ft DOHC 32-valve V-8 TRANSMISSION 6-speed manual CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,711 lb (54/46%) WHEELBASE 107.1 in LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 189.7 x 75.9 x 53.6 in 0-60 MPH 4.0 sec QUARTER MILE 12.2 sec @ 118.9 mph BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 101 ft 0-100-0 MPH 12.5 sec LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.08 g (avg) MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.3 sec @ 0.87 g (avg) 2.2-MI ROAD COURSE LAP 96.11 sec EPA CITY/HWY/COMB FUEL ECON 14/21/16 mpg ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 241/160 kW-hrs/100 miles CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB 1.18 lb/mile POWER @ RPM 526 hp @ 7,500 rpm TORQUE @ RPM 429 lb-ft @ 4,750 rpm SUSPENSION F;R Struts, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, adj shocks, anti-roll bar BRAKES, F;R 15.5-in vented, drilled disc; 15.0-in vented, drilled disc, ABS
    6 replies | 241 view(s)
  • BostonBeemah's Avatar
    Today, 10:54 AM
    What the hell is going on here?? I dont even know where to start to what could be causing this. Running the BMS single turbo pump flash with only changes being the single bank o2 enabled and ADV option enabled in MHD. Anyone?? http://www.datazap.me/u/bostonbeemah/log-1475074235?log=1&data=1-4-11-25-26-27-28-29 http://www.datazap.me/u/bostonbeemah/log-1475074235?log=0&data=1-4-11-25-26-27-28-29
    5 replies | 234 view(s)
  • Young_man's Avatar
    09-24-2016, 04:30 PM
    My GC's have been installed for nearly 3 months now with no issues at all and as of right now I'm targeting 23lbs of boost on 93 pump and the car feels AMAZING. There isn't much action where I live so once a friend told me that guys from out of town were looking to come to us for some action, I was all in. The owner of a white ZL1 Camaro (unknown mods) came up to me asking what all I had done and I gave the same response I always give.. "Some bolt-on's and a tune"... He responded with "so about 400 maybe" and then asked if I wanted to run. I kinda felt like he was hoping to play bully but it didn't work in his favor lol. We did 3 runs before the night was over.. A 40 roll and 2 digs. Each race just ended worse for him. He wanted to run a 4th time but I told him I was done for the night. With that being said, I know some of you have your issues with Tony but VTT puts out products that perform excellent and I'm glad I was patient when it came to deciding which route I wanted to go with my turbo upgrades. Now on to the only half way decent video my friend recorded of one of my runs with the ZL1. *All footage was recorded in Mexico*
    2 replies | 502 view(s)
  • E92 420's Avatar
    09-23-2016, 04:02 PM
    Does anybody know what The procedure is for this?
    3 replies | 360 view(s)
  • E36luv's Avatar
    09-26-2016, 06:55 PM
    E36luv started a thread For Sale: VM 6466 Single Turbo kit in Buy/Sell - Parts
    I have decided that I don't need to have two BMW FI builds going on at the same time so I am selling this kit that I bought used. (I am focusing on my e36 build for now) I never installed it but if I remember correctly it has approximately 5k miles on it. The compressor housing is polished and the 3.5 down pipe merges to the stock exhaust. Manifold and downpipe are wrapped in DEI heat wrap. I will post pictures this weekend. Brand new this would cost $5795 without shipping. I am asking $4,995 shipped. That is at least $1,000 off and you won't have to wait for the kit to be built it will ship right away. Description of parts from VM - 2 piece 304 Stainless SCH10 top mount manifold all Tig welded by hand and purged. -3.5" 304 Stainless downpipe (The only kit offered with a 3.5" downpipe on the market) -304 Stainless dumptubes or recirculated wastegate tubes -2.5" Aluminum charge pipe -Water pump inlet tube with Billet flange -Your choice of Precision Ball Bearing Turbo -2 Tial MV-S wastegates (I am an authorized Tial distributor so you can be assured they are genuine TIAL and not a knock off.) -Single Turbo BMS airfilter -Mac Solenoid with PNP harness - -4 AN stainless braided hoses and fittings for all of the wastegate reference lines (Also the only kit to offer this, this is very important given how tightly packed everything is in the hottest portion of the engine bay.) -Coolant Tank relocation brackets - Billet Oil drain flange --10 AN stainless hardline oil drain tube -Billet adapter for oil feed to the block -Billet block offs for the coolant ports in the head -6 feet of heater hose and fittings to relocate the coolant tank - -4 Stainless braided hose for oil feed with fiberglass insulation to shield it from the heat -Hardware for manifold where shorter nuts are needed and well as all the required bolts and clamps -2 2.5" Silicone Couplers and clamps -90 degree Silicone Coupler for the water pump inlet - Turbo Blanket
    3 replies | 269 view(s)
  • bigdnno98's Avatar
    09-26-2016, 08:04 PM
    BNIB MMP stock location inlets. $200 shipped.
    3 replies | 221 view(s)
  • BeastMode335i's Avatar
    09-23-2016, 08:20 AM
    I've upgraded to LCI tails so these must go.. No chips or breaks anywhere... Located in Fort Myers, FL Asking $240 picked up or $275 shipped, Thanks!
    2 replies | 311 view(s)
  • DFM's Avatar
    09-26-2016, 05:43 PM
    DFM started a thread E82/E88: Finally a member of the club. in 1 Series and 1M
    Just bought myself a 2010 135i m-sport steptronic. 63k miles, California car with outstanding maintenance history. Couldn't be happier :) EDIT: I was never that active of a member, but I used to poke around a bit. disappeared for years but now im back and I actually OWN a BMW this time (old car was a shitty v6 mustang from 2004).
    3 replies | 158 view(s)
  • RW Carbon's Avatar
    09-22-2016, 04:17 PM
    RW Carbon BMW F10 Performance Style Carbon Fiber Lip Spoiler -Real 2x2 carbon fiber and then given a clear coat to ensure it looks this great for years to come. -Each one is quality checked at our facility in Anaheim CA and is backed by our fitment and quality guarantee. Special Forum Sale: $540 plus FREE shipping in the continental United States. **PM me or email greg@rwcarbon.com to receive special pricing** to view F10 Performance Style Front Lip Spoiler on website click here **PM me or email greg@rwcarbon.com to receive special pricing**
    2 replies | 251 view(s)
  • bradsm87's Avatar
    09-25-2016, 01:18 AM
    I've posted about some of these a couple of years ago so sorry about the partial re-post BUT has anybody actually seen any difference by changing any of the following tables? Torque Limit Offset Torque Limit Offset A Torque Max Intervention Mode (some say raise, some say lower, some say leave stock)
    1 replies | 231 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    09-22-2016, 06:31 PM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum olgaudaray2397.
    0 replies | 378 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    09-22-2016, 04:14 AM
    Dfaginboind, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 370 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    09-23-2016, 02:32 AM
    Welcome vanhung1234, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 367 view(s)
More Activity