Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Popular Last 24 Hours Clear All
  • Terry@BMS's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:25 PM
    Hey guys, A little good news, around 18 months in the making. We finally received formal CARB approval for our N54 dual cone intake system! This adds to our N55 Stage1 tuner and N18 JB+ that are also 50 state legal. With more products in the process. :burnrubber: CARB Approved Under Executive Order (EO) No. D-744-2 for all 2007-2012 BMW Models Equipped with the N54 3.0L twin-turbocharged 6-cylinder engine.
    9 replies | 445 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:54 PM
    The other day BoostAddict posted an article regarding Weistec's legal action against Dime Research and Development or Dime Consulting. Clearly those involved with Dime realize the walls are closing in so what are they doing in the meantime while the courts play this out? BS'ing people on forums and trying to do as much damage to Weistec as possible. It's a very simple recipe and it happens more often than you think. Simply offer someone some parts for a discount or free in exchange for posting a thread including a positive review while bashing a competitor. It happens all the time. MHP was the best at this. The owner even asked me directly to create fake accounts for him on other forums so he could do this. When a ship is sinking which in this case it is a company it takes cash to stay afloat or keep the doors open. When HPF (Horsepower Freaks) was in a similar position the owner would go on the forums and post videos of how his shop was filled with cars hoping to instill confidence in potential customers. It's easy to see through the BS though if you have enough experience or have been on the forums long enough. In this instance, it was way too easy: This 'Guilty' fellow posts a graph claiming it is a C63 M177, bashes Weistec, and says how great his tune is. That tune curve looks pretty familiar though, doesn't it? Very similar but not the exact figures yet clearly an AMG GT M178 graph and not a C63 M177 graph. If it was the exact same graph as the graph Weistec advertises with that would be too obvious even to your typical forum moron. Maybe they took another run file or just changed a correction factor? If we had the actual bevvy of dyno run files from the Dynojet software testing we could prove this. Oh, it just so happens we do: That would be runfile 88 from Weistec's ECU tuning. Exact same baseline and the exact same after the tune numbers. Because it's the exact same files. This poor schmuck is either a Dime schill or he believes that is the runfile for his car. Either way the guys reading on forums just assume this is the truth and that they can get the same results as Weistec for less money. If the software is stolen and no development work took place, yep, it's possible to offer a lower price. For those who would like to verify for themselves, here are the Dynojet run files: RunFile_002_stock.drf RunFile_088_Testing.drf As stated, it's a simple recipe. Post a graph, have a few fake accounts chime in where the administration doesn't care because it's too big to care, and you get the desired result which is herding the sheep in the direction you want them to go. Now tell me, who would you trust? The company facing litigation from multiple parties with people involved accused of stealing millions and potentially funneling money overseas that advertises software they did not even develop or BenzBoost? Hmm: It seems not everyone is so easily swayed:
    9 replies | 603 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 03:34 PM
    The other day BoostAddict posted an article regarding Weistec's legal action against Dime Research and Development or Dime Consulting. Clearly those involved with Dime realize the walls are closing in so what are they doing in the meantime while the courts play this out? BS'ing people on forums and trying to do as much damage to Weistec as possible. It's a very simple recipe and it happens more often than you think. Simply offer someone some parts for a discount or free in exchange for posting a thread including a positive review while bashing a competitor. It happens all the time. MHP was the best at this. The owner even asked me directly to create fake accounts for him on other forums so he could do this. When a ship is sinking which in this case it is a company it takes cash to stay afloat or keep the doors open. When HPF (Horsepower Freaks) was in a similar position the owner would go on the forums and post videos of how his shop was filled with cars hoping to instill confidence in potential customers. It's easy to see through the BS though if you have enough experience or have been on the forums long enough. In this instance, it was way too easy: This 'Guilty' fellow posts a graph claiming it is a C63 M177, bashes Weistec, and says how great his tune is. That tune curve looks pretty familiar though, doesn't it? Very similar but not the exact figures yet clearly an AMG GT M178 graph and not a C63 M177 graph. If it was the exact same graph as the graph Weistec advertises with that would be too obvious even to your typical forum moron. Maybe they took another run file or just changed a correction factor? If we had the actual bevvy of dyno run files from the Dynojet software testing we could prove this. Oh, it just so happens we do: That would be runfile 88 from Weistec's ECU tuning. Exact same baseline and the exact same after the tune numbers. Because it's the exact same files. This poor schmuck is either a Dime schill or he believes that is the runfile for his car. Either way the guys reading on forums just assume this is the truth and that they can get the same results as Weistec for less money. If the software is stolen and no development work took place, yep, it's possible to offer a lower price. For those who would like to verify for themselves, here are the Dynojet run files: RunFile_002_stock.drf RunFile_088_Testing.drf As stated, it's a simple recipe. Post a graph, have a few fake accounts chime in where the administration doesn't care because it's too big to care, and you get the desired result which is herding the sheep in the direction you want them to go. Now tell me, who would you trust? The company facing litigation from multiple parties with people involved accused of stealing millions and potentially funneling money overseas that advertises software they did not even develop or BenzBoost? Hmm: It seems not everyone is so easily swayed:
    9 replies | 134 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:31 PM
    The Competition Package for the BMW F82 M4 and BMW F80 M3 sharpens the car with new suspensions pieces, a new differential, new 20 inch wheels, and new tires. It also increases S55 engine output to 444 horsepower which is just achieved through software tuning. It is worth the $5500 asking price for the suspension, differential, and wheels alone. We all know you can get greater engine gains from aftermarket tuning for less money. Still, the car is supposed to be faster than the standard M4. Look at the results of German magazine testing from Autobild and Sport Auto: WTFBBQ? The elasticity is worse somehow. The standard car in Sport Auto testing shows an advantage to 100 kph and 200 kph. Only in the 0-200 kph sprint by Auto Bild does the M4 Competition Package show an advantage. What is going on here? If we were to guess the new larger wheels are slowing things down a bit and also making traction off the line more difficult. It is likely that warmer weather contributed to the results as well. In equal conditions with equal traction there is no way the Competition Package should be slower. We will just have to wait for numbers from US magazines to prove this.
    4 replies | 301 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:27 PM
    The Competition Package for the BMW F82 M4 and BMW F80 M3 sharpens the car with new suspensions pieces, a new differential, new 20 inch wheels, and new tires. It also increases S55 engine output to 444 horsepower which is just achieved through software tuning. It is worth the $5500 asking price for the suspension, differential, and wheels alone. We all know you can get greater engine gains from aftermarket tuning for less money. Still, the car is supposed to be faster than the standard M4. Look at the results of German magazine testing from Autobild and Sport Auto: WTFBBQ? The elasticity is worse somehow. The standard car in Sport Auto testing shows an advantage to 100 kph and 200 kph. Only in the 0-200 kph sprint by Auto Bild does the M4 Competition Package show an advantage. What is going on here? If we were to guess the new larger wheels are slowing things down a bit and also making traction off the line more difficult. It is likely that warmer weather contributed to the results as well. In equal conditions with equal traction there is no way the Competition Package should be slower. We will just have to wait for numbers from US magazines to prove this.
    4 replies | 62 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:20 PM
    This not exactly a leak as it was included by Daimler in their half-year update document. The roadmap does show some interesting things though. The rumored Mercedes pickup truck is on the way (likely not for the USA) as well as a GLA Coupe model which will be similar to the GLE Coupe. What is interesting is the AMG GT C Coupe listed. What is it exactly? The AMG GT is already a coupe. With how Mercedes is labeling four-door vehicles as coupes it seems this would point to a four-door AMG GT. Maybe it's just a mistake? The four-door AMG GT rumors continue to run rampant though. Is squeezing yet another 'four-door coupe' variant into a mix a good idea? Is it overkill? Is it necessary? Probably not but if they can make money they will do it. We'll have to see what this model amounts to.
    1 replies | 243 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 02:53 PM
    A twin turbo 3.0 liter V6 from Toyota and Lexus? It certainly fits into the modern automotive landscape where seemingly everyone has a turbo six cylinder motor. Well, everyone except Lexus but if the rumors are true one is under development. This rumor started with an article from Japanese magazine Mag-X but it is not verified so keep that in mind. Considering this motor is badly needed it is likely a good guess regardless. The code name is supposedly 934F. What can we expect? A 3.0 liter direct injected twin turbo V6 with 400 horsepower and over 300 lb-ft of torque. Additionally, this motor would likely see use in the 2019 Lexus GS series as well as that new Toyota Supra which itself continues to be rumored. Bring it on. The more boost the better.
    2 replies | 107 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 01:50 PM
    These cars are definitely in the same class and it is a comparison we all want to see. AutoExpress is not exactly known for high quality but they do a decent job covering the differences between the cars. Most importantly that the 570S is the lightest and rear wheel drive. The 911 Turbo S and Audi R8 of course are all wheel drive. The R8 is stated to have the most horsepower but if you look at dyno results the Mclaren 570S is underrated. Not to mention it has more torque than the R8 thanks to turbochargers. The Porsche 911 Turbo S of course is also turbocharged and also has more torque than the R8. The problem with this comparison is the same problem that plagues many British comparisons. It's damp out on the track and this is a tight course meaning traction will be at a premium. The 570S is wearing soft rubber meaning cold and damp conditions are not in its favor especially with rear wheel drive traction. Despite the adverse conditions the McLaren 570S laps the quickest and sets a new course record. Lap Times: 570S - 42.710 911 Turbo S - 42.950 R8 V10 Plus - 43.680 The gap would likely be larger on a longer course in better conditions. Also, it will likely take a Huracan Superleggera to take on the 570S especially considering the Audi 5.2 liter V10 is outmuscled in this company. All three are spectacular cars no matter what the laptimes say.
    1 replies | 190 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 10:59 PM
    tienduat82, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 193 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:50 AM
    CharlotteR, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 137 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 01:07 AM
    Welcome PearlenePi, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 137 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 12:40 AM
    Welcome ladykillah4u629x, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 135 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:22 PM
    Welcome flip4335, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 135 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 08:51 PM
    Hey TashaMulle: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 132 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 11:06 PM
    Hey gaunhoc18: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 128 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 12:29 AM
    giaitri0003, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 127 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:15 PM
    Welcome Jamesdonelson, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 127 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:01 AM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum NewtonSwan.
    0 replies | 126 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 02:44 AM
    poiuytrewq62, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 126 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 12:02 AM
    Welcome veer90, take a look around, I think you will like what you see.
    0 replies | 126 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 04:25 AM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum nitfarm2016.
    0 replies | 122 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:59 PM
    TerrieDesp, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 120 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:59 PM
    Hey nikkiard102: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 118 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:01 AM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum dentertainment.
    0 replies | 113 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:02 PM
    Hey HWHStuart: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 112 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 09:26 AM
    boostingS7, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 74 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 08:57 AM
    nhungnguyen, we appreciate you taking the time to join.
    0 replies | 74 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 08:56 AM
    Hey Darrel45D: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 73 view(s)
More Activity