Activity Stream

Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Forums Last 24 Hours Clear All
  • Tony@VargasTurboTech's Avatar
    Today, 09:19 PM
    I love Slickshiesters inlet post, oh hey our inlets made THIS MUCH MORE POWER! Oh we forgot to leave out, we completely retuned, and have no idea how much boost we are not running but its a LOT! If you want to test inlets do before and after same tune, same dyno, this guy picked up 30WTQ which is basically what you will see as the freer flow will give you most boost down low, but you most likely have to add WDGC or PWM to get more boost up top. No one wants to mention, we had a VTT inlet FBO stock turbo car on the dyno that day, and we had the most WHP out of everyone including the TFT inlet car. Whoops
    10 replies | 396 view(s)
  • MikeB@FFTEC's Avatar
    Today, 08:57 PM
    Updates!!! Anthony is helping this GTR with a facelift! New parts will be coming in soon. This 4G63 build is coming along and will be ready to install very soon. Test fitting the new Borg Warner EFR turbos on the Porsche 911. I cought a shot of a wild Anthony in its natural habitat. Give us a call for all your tire mounting and balancing needs! Help us finish the pyramid! Ron stopped by with some new shoes! Random GTR photos from in shop projects. Highway 5 casualties.
    79 replies | 2795 view(s)
  • Abacus38's Avatar
    Today, 08:51 PM
    That's what I'm thinking. I have to go back to the jb4 stack until someone is able to write a code for BBG/2step/NLS/boost limit greater then 22 psi for us flash tuners
    87 replies | 1292 view(s)
  • Torgus's Avatar
    Today, 08:40 PM
    That will be your best mod. Let's you have a car up and can park one underneath plus so much easier to work on. I think a bottom mount is best for a dd as I worry a bit about the turbo being so close to everything. Has anyone with a top mount gone on a long drive and beaten on it other than shiv? I also like the bottom mount as it is sleeper like, keeps heat out of the engine bay, etc.
    87 replies | 1292 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 08:39 PM
    Welcome to a real enthusiast forum nani mucciolo.
    0 replies | 1 view(s)
  • Torgus's Avatar
    Today, 08:38 PM
    Jb4 boost per gear being huge no? Plus 2 step if you want to launch etc.
    87 replies | 1292 view(s)
  • Legionofboom's Avatar
    Today, 08:31 PM
    Legionofboom replied to a thread Project - Timeattack e90 in S65
    FOUR DOORS MORE WHO..... :P Sedan life <3
    71 replies | 1926 view(s)
  • Torgus's Avatar
    Today, 08:28 PM
    Torgus replied to a thread Project - Timeattack e90 in S65
    I pos repped you. Makes perfect sense. Build looks awesome. I'm jelly.
    71 replies | 1926 view(s)
  • drfrink24's Avatar
    Today, 08:27 PM
    99% sure I'm going top mount single, likely the VM 6465 w/1.0AR. But I've decided to install a lift in my garage first, which buys me some time to see what develops in the meantime.
    87 replies | 1292 view(s)
  • dbarton62's Avatar
    Today, 08:17 PM
    Is this tune compatible with the Z4 MS 45.0. I gave read that the E85 platform ECU has some additional challenges to tune?
    30 replies | 1899 view(s)
  • Abacus38's Avatar
    Today, 08:00 PM
    Another thing to talk about is the tuning aspect of single turbo. What are the pros and con's of going flash vs JB4 on the single turbo front?
    87 replies | 1292 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 07:48 PM
    That's still big news though. I mean if that's all it takes this in theory could be done on all the Jaguar models using the M112 right?
    221 replies | 12132 view(s)
  • Toolman's Avatar
    Today, 07:46 PM
    No they're longer, I machined up a spacer to go between the case and the drive plate.
    221 replies | 12132 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 07:35 PM
    Sticky started a thread article test in Test Section
    0 replies | 10 view(s)
  • karel's Avatar
    Today, 07:33 PM
    karel replied to a thread Project - Timeattack e90 in S65
    My past car (e30) was a 4 door. and not many people build on the 4 door, so its a bit different and that's always good :)
    71 replies | 1926 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 07:23 PM
    Hey jonlaw82: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 5 view(s)
  • AlexQuattro's Avatar
    Today, 07:18 PM
    AlexQuattro replied to a thread Project - Timeattack e90 in S65
    Be careful, I asked the same thing in post 4 and was negged hard haha
    71 replies | 1926 view(s)
  • NniftyFour's Avatar
    Today, 07:10 PM
    From what I understand any Haswell i(X) processor will work fine. So any if it was made in 2014 or later you should be good to go. Also go to power settings and change to High performance, Some new windows machines have USB suspension settings that can possibly mess things up.
    2 replies | 29 view(s)
  • V8Bait's Avatar
    Today, 07:01 PM
    Yeah, that's the one I was looking at, and why I had to do a double take on if it was absolute or something until it clicked that was a 3.5 bar sensor haha. That log made me smile and think about the classic thread where Wedge had a perfect 21psi boost "curve" with the incredible Advanced Tuning (R) they now offer. :snort: Edit: 1000th post wooo
    10 replies | 396 view(s)
  • ba114's Avatar
    Today, 06:30 PM
    i have used my surface pro 2 with windows 8.1 since day one and it works flawlessly. I dont know why you bothered posting this though, the time you've spent typing the post and waiting on replies you could have actually tested it yourself and found out whether it works fine...
    2 replies | 29 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:10 PM
    So the M122 rotors just... fit?
    221 replies | 12132 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Today, 06:07 PM
    We have already seen over 600 wheel horsepower from the Pure Turbos Stage 2 BMW S55 engine turbo upgrades. That 632 rear wheel horsepower figure they hit was not on pump gas but on race gas. So what can one expect with the Pure Turbos Stage 2 on an F80 M3 or F82 M4 with pump gas? Well thanks to BMS we have the answer to that question. BMS used their F80 M3 for testing and compared the results to the stock turbos. The BMS M3 with a JB4 tune on the stock turbos put down 479 RWHP on pump gas. The number goes to 518 with the Pure Turbos Stage 2 turbochargers. Now 91 octane pump fuel in California is not exactly boost or tuner friendly. To see the most of this upgrade on 91 octane pump one will need to utilize methanol injection. The result with methanol injection is 579 wheel horsepower and a gain of 62 lb-ft of torque at the wheels over straight 91: Of course people will also mention ethanol but E85 is not a reality for everyone. Not to mention this is still early in S55 tuning and we all know how many fueling issues there have been with direct injected turbocharged BMW motors and ethanol. For those who do have E85 available at the pump it should be looked into if they intend to tune the S55. For those on 91 octane pump though, these 91 + meth injection results are promising.
    0 replies | 9 view(s)
  •'s Avatar
    Today, 06:03 PM
    Bump for a great deal @ Mike
    43 replies | 2136 view(s)
  • AdminTeam's Avatar
    Today, 05:20 PM
    Hey LavinaZ619: :text-welcomewave:
    0 replies | 44 view(s)
  • Toolman's Avatar
    Today, 05:17 PM
    Here's and update on the M122 rotors in the M112 case. I used the stock 3in. dia. pulley to keep the boost down but with the new rotors boost is still around 10lbs and comes in even quicker. It's amazing how much torque this thing has! It truly is a blast to drive. I added a water/meth injection for peace of mind when I do a pulley change for even more boost. Not sure how much more the auto trans can handle tho so maybe I'll just enjoy for awhile first. :dance:
    221 replies | 12132 view(s)
More Activity